Legal Opinion
Bowman v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided July 17, 2007PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
SENIOR Judge McCLOSKEY.
Curtis Bowman (Petitioner) petitions for review from a determination of the Pennsylvania Board of Probation and Parole (Board) recalculating Petitioner’s parole violation maximum date. For the reasons that follow, we affirm.
On December 6, 1990, the Board paroled Petitioner from his original four-year state prison sentence with an original maximum term expiry of December 6, 1992. On June 19, 1991, Philadelphia Police arrested Petitioner on a new state firearms charge. Petitioner was released on bail and, thereafter, on June 21, 1991, he was detained on a Board…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- United States v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Reno v. KoraySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Gaito v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Martin v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
- McCray v. Pennsylvania Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Baasit v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Koehler v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
- Lawrence v. Pa. Bd. of Prob. & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- Burno v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
- Freeman v. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & ParoleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.