Legal Opinion

Grant v. Gosnell

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided March 10, 1976No. 20185PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rhodes, Justice:

This is a derivative action instituted by a stockholder of the First State National Bank (FSNB), a national banking association doing business in Aiken and Saluda Counties, based on allegations of fraud and mismanagement in connection with the operation of FSNB. Two of the ten named defendants in the complaint objected to the jurisdiction of the lower court on the ground that plaintiff-stockholder, Irby Grant, did not have the right to bring the action based on the contention that the complaint failed to show that an effort for redress within FSNB would have been unavailing.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Stahn v. Catawba MillsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1898
  2. Latimer v. Richmond, &c., R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1893
  3. Boles v. SmithTennessee Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Jacobs v. Ass'n of Independent Colleges & SchoolsSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1975
  5. Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1948

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Carolina First Corp. v. WhittleCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2000
  2. Richardson Construction Co. v. Meek Engineering & Construction Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1980
  3. Brad Walbeck v. The I'On CompanySupreme Court of South Carolina · 2023
  4. Wp Church, LLC v. WhalenNorth Carolina Business Court · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API