Carolina First Corp. v. Whittle
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
HOWARD, Judge:
In this stockholder’s derivative suit, we are asked to consider the demand and pleading requirements of Rule 23(b)(1), SCRCP. Three shareholders of Carolina First Corporation brought this action, primarily seeking to recover disproportionate stock bonuses paid to three high level officers. The trial court dismissed the action pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), SCRCP, because the complaint failed to allege particularized facts to meet or excuse the demand requirements of Rule 23(b)(1), SCRCP. We affirm.
FACTUAL/PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Carolina First Corporation (“Carolina First”) is the…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Kamen v. Kemper Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Aronson v. LewisSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
- Hawes v. OaklandSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,860 Athalie Doris Joy v. Nelson L. North, Nelson L. NorthCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
- Daily Income Fund, Inc. v. FoxSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Nemazee v. Premier, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Clearwater Trust v. BuntingSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2006
- Rob Star v. TI Oldfield Development, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
- Walbeck v. I'On Co.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2018
- Allen Patterson, Steve Tilton, Richard Sendler, Lincoln Privette, Marc Ellis, Joey Carter, Barry Davis, Michael Nieri, Allen Patterson Residential LLC v. WitterSupreme Court of South Carolina · 2018
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.