Legal Opinion

Celotex Corp. v. Wilson

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided May 27, 1992PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOLLAND, Justice:

Following a four week jury trial in the Superior Court, 1 the defendant-appellant, The Celotex Corporation (“Celotex”), was found liable to the plaintiffs-appellees, Edward Kline, Pauline Kline, John Wilson, Charles Watts, and Alton Coney, for their asbestos-related injuries, and to plaintiffs-appellees, Edward Kline, Pauline Kline, Ruth Wilson, Verna Watts, and Phyllis Coney for their loss of consortium claims. Celotex has appealed from the individual judgments entered following the jury’s verdicts and from the order denying Celotex’s motion for a new trial. 2 This Court…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Thiel v. Southern Pacific Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Tricoche v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987
  3. Riley v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1985
  4. United States v. E.A. Gregory, Vonna Jo Gregory, G.W. Atkinson and Robert T. Spurlock, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  5. United States v. EvansCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. AyersSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  2. Gattis v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1994
  3. State v. TorgersonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Timblin v. Kent General Hosp.(Inc.)Supreme Court of Delaware · 1994
  5. Sudler v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API