Legal Opinion
State v. Torgerson
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided May 25, 2000No. 990340PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NEUMANN, Justice.
[¶ 1] Torgerson appeals from a judgment finding him guilty of driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor. Tor-gerson argues he is entitled to a new trial because the Burleigh County jury panel selection process is not random. We affirm.
[¶ 2] On May 9, 1999, Steven Torgerson was charged in Burleigh County with driving under the influence of intoxicating liquor. A jury trial was held on November 1, 1999. Before trial, Torgerson orally moved to disqualify the jury panel alleging the selection process was not .random. The trial court summoned the Clerk of the District…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Duren v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. Clarence Christian NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- United States of America, Appellee/cross-Appellant v. Alfred J. Rioux, Appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Z. T. KennedyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. E.A. Gregory, Vonna Jo Gregory, G.W. Atkinson and Robert T. Spurlock, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- State v. PalmerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. CainNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. KellyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Lies v. Director, North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- Wetzel v. North Dakota Department of TransportationNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.