Tricoche v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLAND, Justice.
Following a non-jury trial in the Superior Court in and for New Castle County, the defendant, Nephtali Tricoche, was convicted of various drug related offenses. On appeal, the defendant raises two claims. First, he asserts that the State did not adequately establish a chain of custody for the drugs that were admitted into evidence. Second, he asserts that he was denied his right of self-representation. The State moved to affirm the judgment of the Superior Court pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 25(a) on the grounds that it is manifest upon the face of the appellant’s brief that…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Hooks v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1980
- United States v. Thomas Norman GayCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1985
- United States v. Edmundo Howard-AriasCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1982
- United States v. George Ted PhillipsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by108 opinions
- Murphy v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1993
- Delaware Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. DuphilySupreme Court of Delaware · 1997
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
- Shipley v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1990
- Milligan v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2015
103 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.