Legal Opinion

Petefish by and Through Clancy v. Dawe

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1983No. 16135-PRPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

137 Ariz. 569 (1983)

672 P.2d 914

Joshua W. PETEFISH, a minor and disabled person, By and Through his guardian ad litem, Kenneth P. CLANCY, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

C. Kendall DAWE and Millie Dawe, husband and wife; and Grady C. Dawe, a single person, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 16135-PR.

Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc.

October 6, 1983.

Reconsideration Denied November 15, 1983.

Langerman, Begam, Lewis & Marks by Samuel Langerman, Noel Fidel, Phoenix, for plaintiffs-appellants.

Robbins & Green, P.A. by Michael J. O'Grady, Phoenix, for defendants-appellees.

FELDMAN, Justice.

Appellant (plaintiff)…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Grant v. Arizona Public Service Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1982
  2. Leek v. DillardMissouri Court of Appeals · 1957
  3. Gilbert v. QuinetArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Joel W. Martin v. City of New Orleans and David MichellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  5. Beck v. BrowningTexas Supreme Court · 1937

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Arnold v. Arizona Department of Health ServicesArizona Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Readenour v. Marion Power ShovelArizona Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Amerco v. ShoenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
  4. Durnin v. Karber Air Conditioning Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  5. State v. MartinezCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1993

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API