Legal Opinion

Amerco v. Shoen

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided August 29, 1995No. 1 CA-CV 92-0178PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FIDEL, Judge.

This suit by a corporation against participants in a failed takeover attempt is one of many battles in the ongoing Shoen family war for control of the U-Haul corporate empire. After a five week trial, the jury returned verdicts for defendants, rejecting claims that defendants had violated their fiduciary duty to the corporation. On appeal, the corporation attacks the trial court’s jury instructions, evidentiary rulings, and refusal to permit the jury to consider nominal damages. We find no reversible error and affirm.

I. BACKGROUND

A previous opinion describes the family and…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Sparks v. Republic National Life InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1982
  2. In Re Tri-Star Pictures, Inc., LitigationSupreme Court of Delaware · 1993
  3. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,731 Arnold S. Wellman v. Fairleigh S. Dickinson, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1982
  4. Bradshaw v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Wellman v. DickinsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1979

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Standard Chartered PLC v. Price WaterhouseCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1997
  2. Dawson v. WithycombeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  3. Bike Fashion Corp. v. KramerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  4. State v. DunlapCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  5. Grand v. NacchioCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2006

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API