Legal Opinion

Durnin v. Karber Air Conditioning Co.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 7, 1989No. 1 CA-CIV 9824PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EUBANK, Judge.

This is an action for personal injuries incurred on a construction project. The appellant, Dennis Durnin (Durnin), was an employee of the masonry subcontractor and was injured when he fell through an opening in the roof. The primary issue on appeal is whether the trial court properly instructed the jury that a contractor has a duty to keep the premises under its control reasonably safe for the employees of other subcontractors. We hold that the jury was properly instructed and affirm the judgment.

BACKGROUND

The Whitney Company (Whitney) was the general contractor on the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Evans v. PickettArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Powell v. LangfordArizona Supreme Court · 1941
  3. Fluor Corporation v. SykesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
  4. Pruett v. Precision Plumbing, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
  5. Petefish v. DaweArizona Supreme Court · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Dawson v. WithycombeCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  2. Bike Fashion Corp. v. KramerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  3. Lewis v. N.J. Riebe Enterprises, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Czarnecki v. Volkswagen of AmericaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  5. Callender v. Transpacific Hotel Corp.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1993

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API