Legal Opinion

Hough v. Rocky Mountain Fire Insurance

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 1, 1924No. 5,419PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Cooper

Action to recover upon an account stated. The complaint alleges the issuance by the defendant of a hail insurance policy upon the growing crop' of one Harry E. Grant, the destruction of the crop, the assignment of the claim by Grant to plaintiff, and the performance of all the terms and conditions of the policy. In the fifth paragraph of the complaint it is alleged that on August 14, 1922, the plaintiff and defendant, through the latter’s agent and adjuster, O. J. Barringer, agreed upon the sum of $1,160 as the value of the crop destroyed and the promise that it would be paid October 1, 1922.

T…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mayger v. St. Louis Mining & Milling Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1923
  2. Pengelly v. PeelerMontana Supreme Court · 1909
  3. State ex rel. Western Accident & Indemnity Co. v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1918
  4. Noyes v. YoungMontana Supreme Court · 1905
  5. Whittington v. StantonSupreme Court of Florida · 1912

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hardenburgh v. HardenburghMontana Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Holmes v. PottsMontana Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Nelson v. Montana Iron Mining CompanyMontana Supreme Court · 1962
  4. Electrical Products Consolidated v. GoldsteinMontana Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Hanlon v. AndersonMontana Supreme Court · 1972

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API