Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fraser v. Clark

Montana Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 1954No. 9435Published

1Dissent

MR. JUSTICE ANGSTMAN:

(dissenting).

Here the written contract provided that the deed and other legal papers be held in escrow at the Security Trust & Savings Bank of Billings and that “payments will be made there.”

*188It also provided that the vendor shall “deposit with the Security Trust & Savings Bank at Billings” a deed legally sufficient to vest title in the vendee.

Hence the contract by its terms was to be performed in Yellowstone County.

We have repeatedly held that even though the contract be silent as to place of performance it is properly triable in the county of the creditor’s residence…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Heinecke v. ScottMontana Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Johnson v. OgleMontana Supreme Court · 1945
  3. Maio v. GreeneMontana Supreme Court · 1943
  4. Electrical Products Consolidated v. GoldsteinMontana Supreme Court · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API