Legal Opinion

Molander v. Raugust-Mathwig, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided June 10, 1986No. 6556-1-III; 6862-5-IIIPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtThompson, J.

Calvin Raugust appeals a personal judgment against him for $447,011.97 found to be owing to John Molander for architectural fees incurred in the design of two development projects located in Spokane: Riviera Towers, and the Raugust-Mathwig Professional Office Tower. Mr. Raugust contests personal liability for that judgment and further argues $89,621 of the judgment was barred by the statute of frauds and asserts the trial court had no jurisdiction to conduct supplemental proceedings under RCW 6.32.190. Mr. Molander cross-appeals, raising issues concerning prejudgment interest and the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Chemical Bank v. Washington Public Power Supply SystemWashington Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Ridgeview Properties v. StarbuckWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Goodman v. Darden, Doman & Stafford AssociatesWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Family Medical Building, Inc. v. Department of Social & Health ServicesWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  5. White & Bollard, Inc. v. GoodenowWashington Supreme Court · 1961

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sparks v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1986
  2. Lynch v. Deaconess Medical CenterWashington Supreme Court · 1989
  3. Company Stores Development Corp. v. Pottery Warehouse, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 1987
  4. A & W FARMS v. CookCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
  5. A&W Farms v. CookCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API