Legal Opinion

White & Bollard, Inc. v. Goodenow

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 27, 1961No. 35637PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosellini, J.

This is a suit by a real estate broker to recover a fee. Through the services of the appellant, a prospective purchaser was procured, who entered into an “earnest-money agreement” with the respondent. This agreement provided for the sale and purchase of certain real estate and the payment of a commission of $1,200 to the appellant. The agreement was made subject to the condition contained in the following paragraph:

“This offer is subject to and contingent upon Purchaser obtaining satisfactory financing within a period of 90 days from date of the execution of this agreement for the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hedges v. HurdWashington Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Sargent v. Drew-English, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Dryden v. Vincent D. Miller, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1960

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. Larsen v. Walton Plywood Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Mezzanotte v. FreelandCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1973
  3. Goodman v. Darden, Doman & Stafford AssociatesWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Harding v. WillWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  5. F. M. A. Financial Corp. v. Build, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1965

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API