Legal Opinion

Alexiadis v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided February 26, 2016No. 2493 A-12101Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MANNHEIMER, Judge.

This case involves an indigent criminal defendant who is receiving the services of court-appointed counsel (4.e., counsel at pub-lie expense), The question before us is whether the defendant must pay attorney's fees under Alaska Appellate Rule 209(b)(6) if their attorney pursues an interlocutory petition for review during the litigation of the case in the trial court, before the trial court has entered a final judgement in the case. For the reasons explained here, we conclude that the answer is no.

Dimitrios Nickolaos Alexiadis was charged with three counts of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. State v. AlbertAlaska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. McLaughlin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2007
  4. Alexiadis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API