Legal Opinion

McLaughlin v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided December 28, 2007No. A-9971PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COATS, Chief Judge.

This case raises the question of whether a defendant who is represented by counsel can file a pro se petition for review. We conclude that he cannot. We conclude that the decision whether to seek immediate appellate review of a trial court's non-appealable order is a tactical decision that is entrusted to the defendant's attorney under Alaska law.

Factual and procedural background

Micheal L. McLaughlin was convicted of felony driving under the influence, felony refusal to submit to a breath test, and driving while his license was suspended or revoked in a trial…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  3. Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Martinez v. Court of Appeal of California, Fourth Appellate DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  5. Simeon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Harvey v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2012
  2. Perkins v. FhuereCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2024
  3. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2008
  4. Alexiadis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2016
  5. Loren J. Larson Jr. v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API