Legal Opinion

Alexiadis v. State

Court of Appeals of Alaska

Decided July 17, 2015No. 2463 A-12101PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

KOSSLER, Judge.

This petition for review presents the question of whether the trial court had the authority to reject a plea agreement as too lenient because the State, as part of the agreement, gave up the opportunity to prove aggravating factors, thereby limiting the court to a sentence within the applicable presumptive sentencing range. For the reasons explained here, we conclude that the court had no authority to reject the plea agreement on this ground, and that doing so impermissibly infringed on the State's charging discretion. We therefore reverse the superior court's decision…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. Marks v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Public Defender Agency v. Superior Court, Third Judicial DistrictAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Hartley v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 1982
  5. State v. DagueCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2006

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Alexiadis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2016
  2. Nick A. Frankson v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2022
  3. Nick Arthorneal Frankson v. State of AlaskaCourt of Appeals of Alaska · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API