Legal Opinion

Southwick v. City of Santa Barbara

California Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1910No. L.A. No. 2561PublishedCited by 14 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtAngellotti, J.

This case involves the question of the validity of certain proceedings for the doing of street work in the city of Santa Barbara had under the act of February 26, 1901, known as “The Local Improvement Act of 1901” (Stats. 1901, p. 34). It is an action by certain property-owners assessed for the contemplated street improvements to enjoin the further carrying on of the proceedings on the ground that because of alleged failures to comply with certain provisions of the statute, the assessment made for the improvement is void. A portion of plaintiffs’ complaint was stricken out on motion of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bates v. TwistCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
  2. Dehail v. MorfordCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Frank v. MaguireCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  2. Mardis v. McCarthyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  3. Hunt v. ManningCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
  4. City of Los Angeles v. OffnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  5. Bonander v. Town of TiburonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2009

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API