Dehail v. Morford
California Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
The city of Los Angeles adopted an ordinance July 8, 1889, for the widening of First Street from the west side of Los Angeles Street to the west line of Alameda Street, for which certain lands were to be taken, and the costs, damages, and expenses thereof to be paid by an assessment upon other lands to be benefited thereby. .Further proceedings were had under the ordinance, culminating in an assessment upon certain lands bordering upon the improvement, which was placed in the hands of the defendant Morford, as street superintendent of the city, for collection; and the defendant having…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Hewes v. ReisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1870
3Cited by7 opinions
- O. T. Johnson Corp. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
- Southwick v. City of Santa BarbaraCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Ferri v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
- Keller v. City of OaklandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- Haughawout v. PercivalCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.