Legal Opinion
State v. Cochrane
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided April 26, 2006No. 2005-021PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGalway, J.
After a jury trial, the defendant, Daniel Cochrane, was convicted of driving while intoxicated (DWI), fourth offense. See KSA 265:82, :82-b, 11(c) (2004 & Supp. 2005). The defendant appeals an order of the Superior Court {Mangones, J.) denying his motion in limine to exclude the arresting police officer’s testimony regarding the Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus (HGN) test. We affirm.
The record supports the following facts. On August 10, 2003, Officer Marc Beaudry of the Manchester Police Department observed the defendant driving the wrong way on a one-way street in Manchester. After stopping the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- State v. LambertSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001
- State v. O'KeyOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. ArsenaultSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1975
- State v. DahoodSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- State v. Abraham DePaulaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2017
- City of Wichita v. MolitorCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2012
- State of New Hampshire v. Mark BoultonSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2021
- State v. Abraham DePaulaSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2017