City of Wichita v. Molitor
Court of Appeals of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
Bruns, J.:
William J. Molitor appeals his misdemeanor conviction for driving under the influence (DUI). On appeal, he contends that the district court erred by denying his motion to suppress a preliminary breath test (PBT) and an Intoxilyzer breath test. Specifically, Molitor argues that it was error for the district court to consider evidence of a horizontal gaze nystagmus (HGN) test in determining whether a police officer had reasonable suspicion to request that he submit to a PBT. We conclude that it was appropriate for the district court to consider the results of the HGN test administered…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
- Emerson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1994
- State v. O'KeyOregon Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. BressonOhio Supreme Court · 1990
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Wichita v. MolitorSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
- City of Wichita v. MolitorSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015
- City of Wichita v. MolitorSupreme Court of Kansas · 2015