Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Ryan v. Department of Taxation

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 10, 1943PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRosenberry, C. J.

The sole question involved is whether the moneys received by the plaintiff from the Federal Savings & Loan Insurance Corporation and the Federal Home Loan Bank Board were paid to him as an employee or as an independent contractor.

The following is a condensed statement of the facts in this case : The plaintiff is a practicirig lawyer and a member of the firm of Schubring, Ryan & Petersen, of Madison, Wisconsin. In August, 1936, Mr. Horace Russell, general counsel for the Federal Plome Loan Bank Board and for the Home Owners’ Loan Corporation and the Federal Savings & Loan Insurance…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Metcalf & Eddy v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Lucas v. HowardSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Tredway's AdministratrixSupreme Court of Virginia · 1917
  4. Brown v. HebbCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1934
  5. Kolman v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Libertarian Party of Wisconsin v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Theuerkauf v. SuttonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Estate of Hegarty Ex Rel. Hegarty v. BeauchaineCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2001
  4. Majorowicz v. Allied Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1997
  5. Scandrett v. GreenhouseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API