Legal Opinion

Anderson & Middleton Lumber Co. v. Quinault Indian Nation

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided September 6, 1995No. 16638-1-IIPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeinfeld, C.J.

The Quinault Indian Nation appeals a trial court order partitioning and quieting title to an eighty-acre parcel of land lying entirely within the boundaries of the Quinault Indian Reservation. The Nation claims that its purchase of an interest in the land after the commencement of this action divested the trial court of subject matter and personal jurisdiction. We conclude that the trial court retained its jurisdiction to decide the case. Thus, we affirm.

Facts

Anderson & Middleton Lumber Company (Anderson) brought this action to partition and quiet title to a parcel of property that once was…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Catlin v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Wilson v. SteinbachWashington Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Mollan v. TorranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
  4. Clarke v. MathewsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
  5. Hardenbergh v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1894

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. In Re Detention of PetersenWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  2. In re the Detention of PetersenWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Maysonet-Robles v. CabreroCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
  4. State v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 2003
  5. State v. TaylorWashington Supreme Court · 2003

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API