Legal Opinion
Cranwell v. Mesec
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided February 27, 1995No. 33502-2-I; 34080-8-IPublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtPekelis, C.J.
Betti Cranwell (Cranwell) and John Mario Peranzi (Peranzi), owners of Seattle apartment buildings, appeal from orders granting summary judgment to the City of Seattle (the City). On appeal, Cranwell and Peranzi primarily challenge two aspects of the City’s Residential Housing Inspection Program (RHIP): (1) the constitutionality of the City’s inspections of their buildings and (2) the constitutionality of the City’s notice of violation process. Because both appeals were linked for the purposes of oral argument and involve many of the same issues, we find it is appropriate to resolve them in a…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Camara v. Municipal Court of City and County of San FranciscoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Illinois v. RodriguezSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Cowiche Canyon Conservancy v. BosleyWashington Supreme Court · 1992
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- ABC Holdings, Inc. v. Kittitas CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2015
- Housing Resource Group v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
- State v. SaturnoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- Young v. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Young v. Pierce CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.