Legal Opinion

Dawson v. McCarty

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 30, 1899No. 3060PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Appeal from Superior Court, Whatcom County. — -Hon. Hiram E. Hadley, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Reavis, J.

Appellant brought suit to foreclose a mortgage on certain lands in Whatcom county. The mortgage was executed by the defendants Morris McCarty and wife to the Columbia Rational Bank of Mew Whatcom, of which the appellant is receiver. Respondent (defendant) School District Mo. 1 of Whatcom county, has a judgment against defendants McCarty and wife, which is a lien upon the mortgaged premises. On the 16th of September, 1893, the bank was in the custody of a receiver appointed by the comptroller of the currency. At that time the defendant Morris…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Collector v. DaySupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  2. Davis v. OwnsbySupreme Court of Missouri · 1851
  3. Holden v. GarrettSupreme Court of Kansas · 1879
  4. Shirk v. ThomasIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Martin v. NixonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1887

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Pacific State Bank v. CoatsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1913
  2. Ransom v. Wickstrom & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. American Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. HelgesenWashington Supreme Court · 1911
  4. Kim v. LeeWashington Supreme Court · 2001
  5. American Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. HelgesenWashington Supreme Court · 1912

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API