Legal Opinion

State Farm Mutual Insurance v. Shour

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 31, 1975No. Civ. A. 73-661PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

BRODERICK, District Judge.

This is a declaratory judgment action instituted by the plaintiff insurance company for a determination that the defendants cannot “stack” uninsured motorist claims. It comes before the Court on cross-motions of plaintiff State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company (“State Farm”) and defendants Ronald and Herbert Shour for summary judgment and on motion of defendants to dismiss the action on the grounds that: the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted; the Court lacks jurisdiction because the amount in controversy…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. National Grange Mutual Insurance v. KuhnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  2. Travelers Insurance Company v. Marjorie DavisCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  3. Allstate Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1969
  4. Harleysville Mutual Insurance v. MedyckiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1968
  5. Allstate Insurance v. McMonagleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Hartford Insurance Group v. District Court for the Fourth Judicial DistrictSupreme Court of Colorado · 1981
  2. In Re Blank, Rome, Comisky & McCauley Asbestos CasesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. MegillDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API