Legal Opinion
In Re Blank, Rome, Comisky & McCauley Asbestos Cases
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided November 21, 1985No. C.A. 85-2072PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
WEINER, District Judge.
This action for declaratory relief was brought on behalf of three classes of plaintiffs who have causes of action which accrued since the filing on November 1, 1982 of a Petition for Reorganization of Amatex Corporation under the Bankruptcy Code. Class 1 plaintiffs are those whose causes of action accrued after the date of the filing of the bankruptcy petition, who have pending suits filed with this court, and where two or more years transpired since discovery of injury. Class 2 plaintiffs are those whose causes of action accrued after the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In The Matter Of M. Frenville Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- United States v. State Of WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- James K. Shannon, A/K/A James K. Kelly v. Sheriff Sequeechi, Sheriff Lloyd Beair, and Sheriff Bill LessmanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
- State Farm Mutual Insurance v. ShourDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1975
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Clinton Centrifuge, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1988
- Appeal of Amatex CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986
- In Re Blank, Rome, Comisky & McCauley Asbestos Cases, Other Similarly Situated CasesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1986