Legal Opinion
Jennings v. Baxter Healthcare Corp.
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided November 17, 2000No. CC A 9405-03148; CA A92690; SC S45239PublishedCited by 47 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtVan Hoomissen, J.
In this product liability action, plaintiff appeals from a defense verdict. She alleges that she was exposed to silicone from breast implants that leaked and ruptured, causing her personal injuries. The Court of Appeals reversed and remanded for a new trial, holding that the trial court committed reversible error in excluding certain opinion testimony of plaintiffs expert witness. Jennings v. Baxter Healthcare Corp., 152 Or App 421, 954 P2d 829 (1998). Defendants seek reversal of the Court of Appeals’ decision and reinstatement of the trial court’s judgment. For the reasons that follow, we…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- State v. BrownOregon Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. RogersOregon Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. O'KeyOregon Supreme Court · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by47 opinions
- State v. SouthardOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Schafersman v. Agland Coop.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2001
- Meister, Brenda G. v. Medical EngineeringCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
- State v. MarringtonOregon Supreme Court · 2003
- State v. LovernCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2010
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.