Legal Opinion

In Re Nesbitt's Estate

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1937No. Docket No. 136, Calendar No. 39,402Published

1Opinion of the CourtBtjshnell, J.

This appeal is submitted upon an agreed statement of facts as provided in Court Rule No. 66, § 10 (1933).

The claim of plaintiff is that Leopold DeMerey, doing business as Gladwin Plumbing Company, during his lifetime furnished material and labor for the erection of a dwelling house for Dr. William J. Nesbitt, also now deceased; that Dr. Nesbitt agreed to pay for the same and there now remains due and unpaid a balance of $2,950 on a total charge of $3,500, $550 having been paid by Dr. Nesbitt in his lifetime.

This claim was disallowed by the commissioners on claims in the Nesbitt estate. On…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Thompson v. HowardMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
  2. McLaughlin v. AustinMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. F. M. Sibley Lumber Co. v. Wayne Circuit JudgeMichigan Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Haak v. KelloggMichigan Supreme Court · 1906

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API