McLaughlin v. Austin
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Wayne. (Hosmer, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.'
1Opinion of the CourtHooker, J.
The plaintiff contracted with one Jones, a builder, to do certain plumbing in a house which Jones-was erecting under a contract with the defendant. Hpon the part of the plaintiff it is claimed that Jones abandoned the job before it' was completed. Defendant testified that he thought Jones did not abandon the job, but that he neglected to do the work, and, desiring to move in, he, the defendant, put on some help about September 20, to-finish up the work, rather than to wait. Be this as it may, the plaintiff testified that, upon taking certain fixtures to the building, he was informed by the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Mallory v. . GillettNew York Court of Appeals · 1860
- Leonard v. VredenburghNew York Supreme Court · 1811
- Morris v. . RexfordNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Thompson v. HowardMichigan Supreme Court · 1875
- Sanger v. WoodNew York Court of Chancery · 1818
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Zimmerman v. Robinson & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1905
- Barnsdall v. WaltemeyerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
- Henderson Tire & Rubber Co. v. GregoryCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1926
- Carbary v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1909
- Brown v. FletcherCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1910
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.