Haak v. Kellogg
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Calhoun; Hopkins, J. Assumpsit by Harry K. Haak against H. W. Kellogg and Ered W. Rainbow for goods sold and delivered. There was judgment for defendants on a verdict directed by the court, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
The plaintiff is a dealer in lumber. He sued defendants to recover a balance due for lumber furnished under such circumstances he claims made defendants liable to pay for it. The circuit judge directed a verdict for defendants. The case is brought here by writ of error.
A number of assignments of error are argued by counsel, but the important question is whether the case should have been submitted to the jury. The record discloses *542that defendants are the owners of certain real estate; that in the fall of 1903 they let a contract to George Beckley to erect a house thereon. The plaintiff…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- McLaughlin v. AustinMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Gibbs v. BlanchardMichigan Supreme Court · 1867
- Potter v. BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1877
- Wenzel v. JohnstonMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
3Cited by2 opinions
- Monroe Lumber Co. v. BezeauMichigan Supreme Court · 1916
- In Re Nesbitt's EstateMichigan Supreme Court · 1937