Legal Opinion

Sanchez v. City of Tucson

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided February 5, 1998No. CV-97-0134-PRPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MOELLER, Justice.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

¶ 1 In this negligence case, the trial court granted summary judgment to the defendant City of Tucson (“City”). The court of appeals affirmed, based on the theory that the City did not exercise control over the location where the accident occurred, and therefore owed no duty to the infant plaintiff, Jose Sanchez (“plaintiff’). Because we conclude that issues of fact exist which preclude summary judgment, we reverse and remand.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 On the night of March 14,1993, Teresa Barocio, carrying her eighteen-month-old son,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Ontiveros v. BorakArizona Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Gemstar Ltd. v. Ernst & YoungArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  5. United Bank of Arizona v. AllynCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. National Bank of Arizona v. ThrustonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  2. Jennifer G. v. Arizona Department of Economic SecurityCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2005
  3. Larsen v. Nissan Motor Corp. in U.S.A.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1998
  4. Ephraim Dabush v. Seacret Direct LLCArizona Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Gamez v. Brush Wellman, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API