In Re Capanna
California Court of Appeal
PROCEEDING on Habeas Corpus to secure the release of a person convicted on a charge of gambling. Writ granted. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
Petitioner was convicted in the justice court of Scotia Township, county of Humboldt, California, on the alleged charge of gambling, and was sentenced to pay a fine of one hundred dollars, and, in default of payment, to be imprisoned in the county jail of said county of Humboldt one day for every dollar of the fine. The charging part of the said complaint was as follows: “Personally appeared before me, this 22d day of August, 1919, S. Catargli of Wildwood in the County of Humboldt, who, first being duly sworn, complains and says: That said N. Capanna on the 17th day of August, 1919, at…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Matter of ZanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
- People v. CarrollCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Ex Parte GreenallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- In Re AvdalasCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909
- In Re CorreaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1918
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. TobinWyoming Supreme Court · 1924
- Chapman v. AggelerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
- In Re ClarkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1921
- State v. ValdezNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1947
- In Re GarbariniCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.