People v. Wepplo
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, P. J.
The defendants were prosecuted and found guilty by a jury on a charge that they did “wilfully and unlawfully and lewdly, in the City of Los Angeles, sell, distribute *961and keep for sale an obscene and indecent book,” naming it, in violation of subdivision 3 of section 311 of the Penal Code. That section provides in part as follows:
“311. Every person who willfully and lewdly, either:
1. . . . ; or,
2. . . . ; or,
3. Writes, composes, stereotypes, prints, publishes, sells,
distributes, keeps for sale, or exhibits any obscene or indecent writing, paper, or book; ... ; or,
4. . . . ; or,
5. ... ", is…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Dunlop v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- United States v. One Book Entitled Ulysses by James JoyceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
- Whitley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Gardenswartz v. Equitable Etc. Soc.California Court of Appeal · 1937
- United States v. LevineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- State v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1960
- Grand Rapids City Attorney v. BlossMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
- State v. CleinSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
- People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1947
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.