Legal Opinion

People v. Wepplo

Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California

Decided February 24, 1947No. Crim. A. No. 2242PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, P. J.

The defendants were prosecuted and found guilty by a jury on a charge that they did “wilfully and unlawfully and lewdly, in the City of Los Angeles, sell, distribute *961and keep for sale an obscene and indecent book,” naming it, in violation of subdivision 3 of section 311 of the Penal Code. That section provides in part as follows:

“311. Every person who willfully and lewdly, either:

1. . . . ; or,

2. . . . ; or,

3. Writes, composes, stereotypes, prints, publishes, sells,

distributes, keeps for sale, or exhibits any obscene or indecent writing, paper, or book; ... ; or,

4. . . . ; or,

5. ... ", is…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Dunlop v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
  2. United States v. One Book Entitled Ulysses by James JoyceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1934
  3. Whitley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Gardenswartz v. Equitable Etc. Soc.California Court of Appeal · 1937
  5. United States v. LevineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Roth v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. State v. JacksonOregon Supreme Court · 1960
  3. Grand Rapids City Attorney v. BlossMichigan Court of Appeals · 1970
  4. State v. CleinSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  5. People v. JohnsonAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1947

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API