Franklin v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Olsen, C.
Action by Mae Franklin, as mother and natural guardian of Jack Franklin, her minor son, to recover damages for personal injuries claimed to have been caused to the minor by negligence on the part of the defendants. There was a trial by jury. The jury failed to agree, and thereafter, on motions by the defendants, the court ordered judgment in favor of each defendant. Plaintiff appeals from the judgment.
Jack Franklin, a boy about 15% years of age, was injured in a collision between a truck, wherein he was riding, and a freight train of the defendant railway company. The accident…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Opp v. PryorIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
- Cotton v. Willmar & Sioux Falls Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1906
- Davis v. Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1907
- Grant v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Ry. Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1927
- White v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1911
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Franklin v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930