Legal Opinion

Covered Bridge Condominium Ass'n v. Chambliss

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 26, 1985No. B14-85-206CVPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PAUL PRESSLER, Justice.

Appellant sought injunctive relief against appellees for violation of a covenant restricting unit occupancy to those sixteen years of age or older. Appellees counterclaimed seeking a judgment declaring the covenant void and unenforceable. Appel-lees further requested removal of the Notice of Lien filed by appellant against their property. The trial court declared the covenant unreasonable, unconstitutional and unenforceable, cancelled the Notice of Lien and granted appellees attorney’s fees. Although appellant presents several points of error, the pivotal…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Moore v. City of East ClevelandSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  2. Davis v. HueyTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  3. White Egret Condominium, Inc. v. FranklinSupreme Court of Florida · 1979
  4. Riley v. StovesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
  5. Travis Heights Improvement Ass'n v. SmallCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1983

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. World Help v. Leisure Lifestyles, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1998
  2. Munson v. Milton, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1997
  3. Schmidt v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Dodson v. Stevens Transport, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1989
  5. Shorewood West Condominium Ass'n v. SadriCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API