Legal Opinion

Travis Heights Improvement Ass'n v. Small

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided November 16, 1983No. 13862PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PHILLIPS, Chief Justice.

Travis Heights Improvement Association, and several Travis Heights Subdivision homeowners, appeal the judgment of the trial court, which, following a non-jury trial, denied appellants injunctive and declaratory relief as regards enforcement of a restrictive covenant.

We affirm.

The record reflects that in 1913 Travis Heights Subdivision was created; this subdivision is a part of the City of Austin. Among the restrictive covenants set-out in the recorded plat of the subdivision is the following:

4. All lots sold by the Company shall be subject to the following conditions…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Sun Oil Co. (Delaware) v. MadeleyTexas Supreme Court · 1981
  2. City of Pinehurst v. Spooner Addition Water Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1968
  3. Gillespie v. GillespieTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  4. Cherokee Water Co. v. ForderhauseTexas Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Clear Lake City Water Authority v. Clear Lake Utilities Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1977

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. Munson v. Milton, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1997
  2. Nuchia v. Woodruff, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1997
  3. Goodman v. Summit at West Rim, Ltd., Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1997
  4. Emerson v. Fires Out, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1987
  5. Village of Pheasant Run Homeowners Ass'n v. Kastor, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2001

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API