Legal Opinion

Beynon v. TREZZA

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 13, 2009No. 2 CA-CV 2008-0082Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PELANDER, Chief Judge.

¶ 1 In this attorney malpractice action, plaintiffs/appellants Daniel and Susan Bey-non appeal from the trial court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of defendants/appellees Brad Thrush, Stephen Trez-za, and their law firm, Trezza & Bradley (collectively Thrush). It is undisputed that, on plaintiffs’ underlying negligence claim against the state, Thrush failed to timely file an action on their behalf within the one-year limitations period prescribed in A.R.S. § 12-821. Nonetheless, the trial court ruled, plaintiffs could not have prevailed in their underlying…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Orme School v. ReevesArizona Supreme Court · 1990
  2. State v. HendersonArizona Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Deer Valley Unified School District No. 97 v. HouserArizona Supreme Court · 2007
  4. City of Tucson v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2008
  5. Lowing v. Allstate InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 1993

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API