Legal Opinion

Chase v. Oehlke

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 3, 1919No. Civ. No. 2368PublishedCited by 12 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.

This action to recover rent under the terms of a written lease and covenants of the assignments thereof arose out of the following facts: On February 1, 1913, plaintiff executed to one William Oehlke a lease to certain premises for the terms of two years at a specified rental. Oehlke assigned the lease to J. F. Petell, by whom it was assigned to F. D. Griffith, who in turn assigned the same to defendant Ella Swickard, and in each ease the assignee agreed in writing to carry out and fulfill the terms of the lease in the place

and stead of Ms assignor, all of which facts were set forth in the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bonetti v. TreatCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Samuels v. OttingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Brosnan v. KramerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Baker v. Eilers Music CompanyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915
  5. Rehkopf v. WirzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1916

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Hartman Ranch Co. v. Associated Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Realty & Rebuilding Co. v. ReaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1920
  3. Treff v. GulkoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1932
  4. Puget Mill Co. v. KerryWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  5. Bank of America National Trust & Savings Ass'n v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API