Legal Opinion

Purcell v. Cleveland Trust Co.

Cuyahoga County Probate Court

Decided July 20, 1964No. 584452PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMerrick, P. J.

The objection to the jurisdiction of this Court in this case is dismissed on authority of In re Morrison Estate, 159 Ohio St., 285.

The question posed in this case has troubled courts and judges since 1921 when the Ohio legislature authorized and gave recognition to the inter vivos trust. Prior to that date, there was no authority for its existence or validity. As a matter of fact for a century before, a trust for the use of the settlor making the same was void and of no effect. Then came the 1921 amendment under the then title of Section 8617, General Code.

For forty years this statute, later…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Kelley Kar Co. v. FinklerOhio Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Bolles v. Toledo Trust Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Harris v. HarrisOhio Supreme Court · 1947
  4. Hane v. KintnerOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Verdier v. Marshallville Equity Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1940

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In re Estate of KusarCuyahoga County Probate Court · 1965
  2. Purcell v. Cleveland Trust Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API