Harris v. Harris

Was the Court of, Appeals in error in holding that the plaintiff’s husband retained such dominion and control over the corpus of the trust inter vivos as to render the provisions of that trust ineffective to deprive the plaintiff, as the now surviving spouse, of her interest in that property?

The discussion in the opinion of the Court of Appeals is succinct, pertinent and decisive of the sole question presented. Reliance properly is placed upon the rule of l'aw stated and applied by this court in the recent case of Bolles v. Toledo Trust Co., Exr., 144 Ohio St., 195, 58 N. E. (2d), 381, 157 A.…