Legal Opinion
Rosenfield v. Rosenfield
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided December 12, 2000No. AC 20229PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
PETERS, J.
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether the denial of a motion to dismiss is immediately appealable if the movant argues that the trial court lacked subject matter jurisdiction because of alleged statutory constraints on that court’s decision-making authority. The movant does not dispute the general rule that, because such a denial does not preclude further proceedings at trial, the denial of a motion to dismiss ordinarily is not a final judgment and, therefore, not immediately appealable. See, e.g., Sasso v. Aleshin, 197 Conn. 87, 90, 495 A.2d 1066 (1985). The movant…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. CurcioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Monroe v. MonroeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1979
- Connecticut Light & Power Co. v. CostleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1980
- Amodio v. AmodioSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
- Artman v. ArtmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- 37 Huntington Street v. City of HartfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Hunnicutt v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2001
- Bojila v. ShramkoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003
- Strobel v. StrobelConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002