Anant Kumar Tripati v. Gary L. Henman R.J. Barncastle Willis Gibson Richard A. Stacy Leland Pico Dale Berndt
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Per curiam
The dispositive issue in this appeal is whether a district court retains subject matter jurisdiction to consider a timely Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion to alter or amend a judgment when the motion is filed subsequent to a notice of appeal. We reverse the district court’s holding that it lacked jurisdiction over the Rule 59(e) motion.
Anant Kumar Tripati (Tripati) filed an amended civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1985 (1982) against various federal prison officials in June 1986. The officials’ cross-motion for summary judgment was granted on April 14, 1987, and Tripati filed a notice of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Griggs v. Provident Consumer Discount Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Anant Kumar Tripati v. Gary L. HenmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Murray W. Miller, Cross-Appellee v. Transamerican Press, Inc., Cross-Appellants, and Sam Steiger, Deponent, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- In Re Washington Public Power Supply System Securities Litigation. Henry Puchall v. Houghton, Cluck, Coughlin & RileyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 98,249 Homer E. Stephenson and Freda Lois Stephenson, His Wife v. Calpine Conifers Ii, Ltd., a Limited PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by44 opinions
- Russell A. Tinsley v. Bob BorgCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Gilbert Yniques Angel Diaz Carl S. Ramos John Balderama Tony L. Hernandez v. Victor G. Cabral Mario G. ObledoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Woodard v. HardenfelderDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1994
- Tripati v. HenmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Tripati v. HenmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.