Legal Opinion
Woodard v. Hardenfelder
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 15, 1994No. 93-CV-4232PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GLASSER, District Judge:
This is a motion by pro se plaintiff Victor Woodard (“Woodard”) for “reargument of his pro se complaint and upon such reargument for an order reversing the ... order of this court” dated January 7,1994, familiarity with which is assumed. Plaintiff contends that this court erred in dismissing his civil rights complaint without granting him leave to re-plead pursuant to Platsky v. Central Intelligence Agency, 953 F.2d 26 (2d Cir.1991). (On the same day that plaintiff filed his motion for reargument, he also filed a notice of appeal.) For the following…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- Carson v. LewisDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1999
- Advanced Analytics, Inc. v. Citigroup Global Markets, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2014
- Thorsen v. Sons of NorwayDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Bordeaux v. LynchDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1997
- Norton v. Town of BrookhavenDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.