State v. Brazzle

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF KANSAS No. 116,649 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. ANTHONY MICHAEL BRAZZLE, Appellant. SYLLABUS BY THE COURT 1. If a defendant argues he or she lacked the intent to distribute drugs, evidence about a prior crime committed by the defendant may be material, especially if evidence establishes similarities between the prior crime and the charged crime. 2. A party's failure to argue in a petition for review why the Court of Appeals erred in an invited error analysis means the party has waived any argument before this court as to why the invited error doctrine did…