Legal Opinion
State v. Jones
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
Decided January 26, 2005No. 03-3216-CR, 03-3217-CRPublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNettesheim, J.
¶ 1. The State of Wisconsin appeals from an order suppressing evidence obtained during a consent search of an automobile driven by Maurice E. O'Neal. The evidence recovered resulted in charges against O'Neal and the passenger in his vehicle, Reginald R. Jones. The issue in this case is whether O'Neal was seized within the meaning of the Fourth Amendment when he consented to the search. We conclude that he was and therefore his consent was invalid. We affirm the trial court order.
Background
¶ 2. The facts underlying the issue on appeal are not disputed. On April 9, 2003, at 1:49 a.m., Sheboygan…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- United States of America, -Appellee v. William G. WestCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000
- State v. GriffithWisconsin Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. GaulrappCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1996
3Cited by14 opinions
- State v. Lewis O. Floyd, Jr.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
- State v. Derik J. WantlandWisconsin Supreme Court · 2014
- State v. BanksCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2010
- State v. BonsCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007
- State v. KolkCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2006
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.