Legal Opinion

State v. Lewis O. Floyd, Jr.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 2017No. 2015AP001294-CRPublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDaniel Kelly, J.

¶ 1. A law enforcement officer discovered a cache of controlled substances when he performed a warrantless—but allegedly consensual— search of Lewis O. Floyd, Jr. during a traffic stop. Mr. *402Floyd says that because the officer extended the traffic stop without the necessary reasonable suspicion, his alleged "consent" was void and the evidence obtained from the search should have been suppressed. Mr. Floyd also says he received ineffective assistance of counsel at the suppression hearing because his trial counsel failed to present testimony Mr. Floyd believes would have established he was not…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State v. Faith N. ReedWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
  2. State v. Shaun M. SandersWisconsin Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Vincent Milewski v. Town of DoverWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  4. State v. Jessica M. RandallWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019
  5. State v. John Patrick WrightWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API