Legal Opinion

State v. Banks

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided July 21, 2010No. 2009AP1436-CRPublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSnyder, J.

¶ 1. Tarence A. Banks appeals from a judgment of conviction that followed a jury verdict of guilty on two charges: possession of a firearm by a felon and resisting or obstructing an officer. He further appeals from an order denying his motion for postcon*773viction relief. Banks contends that he received ineffective assistance of counsel, that the circuit court failed to properly count prior convictions of a witness for the State, and that the testimony against Banks at trial was insufficient to support the conviction. We agree that Banks received ineffective assistance of counsel and reverse. We…

2Cases cited33 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Rhode Island v. InnisSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Griffin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  5. Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. People v. PollardColorado Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. BOSSE v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2017
  3. State v. GauthierCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2013
  4. BOSSE v. STATECourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 2015
  5. State v. Gary F. LembergerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API