General Electric Co. v. Process Control Co.
Tennessee Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HOLDER, Justice.
This ease comes to us on a certified question of law. The plaintiff, General Electric Company (“G.E.”), filed this action for contribution against Process Control Company (“Process Control”). Process Control filed a motion to dismiss and/or motion for summary judgment arguing that Tennessee law does not permit a right of contribution in this case. The district court entered an order requesting this Court to address the following certified question of law:
In actions that accrue after the decision in McIntyre v. Balentine, under what circumstances is a claim for…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- McIntyre v. BalentineTennessee Supreme Court · 1992
- Owens v. Truckstops of AmericaTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
- Camper v. MinorTennessee Supreme Court · 1996
- Wisconsin Natural Gas Co. v. Ford, Bacon & Davis Construction Corp.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
- Bervoets v. Harde Ralls Pontiac-Olds, Inc.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Banks v. Elks Club Pride of Tennessee 1102Tennessee Supreme Court · 2010
- Bass v. Janney Montgomery Scott, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000
- Autozone, Inc. v. Glidden Co.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2010
- Engstrom v. MayfieldCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2006
- Smith v. Methodist Hospitals of MemphisCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.