Legal Opinion
Autozone, Inc. v. Glidden Co.
District Court, W.D. Tennessee
Decided September 10, 2010No. 08-2851PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART THIRD-PARTY DEFENDANT BASF CONSTRUCTION CHEMICALS’ MOTION TO DISMISS, AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART THIRD-PARTY PLAINTIFF THE GLIDDEN COMPANY’S MOTION TO AMEND
SAMUEL H. MAYS, JR., District Judge.
Before the Court is Third-Party Defendant BASF Construction Chemicals, LLC’s (“BASF”) September 1, 2009 Motion to Dismiss Third-Party Plaintiff The Glidden Company d/b/a ICI Paints’ (“Akzo Nobel”) Third-Party Complaint alleging causes of action for indemnification, contribution, breach of express warranty, breach of the implied warranty of…
2Cases cited59 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Tellabs, Inc. v. Makor Issues & Rights, Ltd.Supreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
54 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Duncan-Williams, Inc. v. Capstone Development, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2012
- Ajose v. Interline Brands, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2016
- Universal Coin & Bullion, Ltd. v. Fedex Corp.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2013
- Brian Carrico, Kacie Carrico, Don Gatlin, and Dora Gatlin v. Uponor, Inc.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2025
- Brown v. Woodbury Auto Group LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2022
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.