Legal Opinion
Chas. E. Knox Oil Co. v. McKee
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 5, 1924No. 14493PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCochran, J.
This was an action commenced by the plaintiff in error to enjoin the defendants in error from interfering with it in drilling wells for oil and gas on a certain one-half acre of land in Kay county, Okla. The parties will be referred to as plaintiff and defendants, as they appeared in the trial court. Samuel H. McKee made homestead entry on 160 acres of land in what is now Kay county, Okla., and filed on the same under the homestead act of Congress, of May 20, 1S62. On August 2, 1894, McKee's wife died and was buried near the northwest corner of the. quarter section, and in September, 1895,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Baltimore & Ohio R. R. v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Virginia · 1885
- Trustees of the Philadelphia Museums v. Trustees of the UniversitySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1915
- Ritter v. CouchWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1912
- Brake v. BlainSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Canadian Coal Co. v. LynchSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Heiligman v. ChambersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959
- Langston City v. GustinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1942
- Republic Nat. Bank of St. Louis v. First State Bank of OiltonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Fidelity Nat. Bank of Oklahoma City v. CopelandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Whitney v. LowSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.